![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgyZOe0mRDJI6_f6PmRUley8nc-nGDjZRt-rXK77_i-6RJvMf7BH5wUf0XEihKJa_xo0YW3wnzC-6wBzeqCH-q5Dm6JLWR_qBJpWRTHd42AG3I3LwTV4yqfUQ1XEOqFAPgf9CAEwPkvVfhz/s320/New+Picture+%25283%2529.bmp)
As a first observation, it is interesting to note the wide performance divergences between the various sectors. There is, for example, more than a 20% difference between the best (health care) and worst (financials) performing sectors. This tends to occur in periods of uncertainty.
The next interesting observation would be the divergence between cyclical and defensive sectors. The better performers (health care, consumer staples) tend to be the defensive sectors which would indicated very bearish sentiment in the markets.
It should come as no surprise that financials are suffering the most considering the uncertainty facing European banks exposed to the sovereign debt of troubled euro zone peripheral countries. What is more curious, however, is the relatively strong positioning of sectors like information technology or energy. For the tech sector, it reflects the boom in technology stocks. Some pundits are drawing parallels with the nineties, arguing that the market may actually be in a bubble.
For energy, however, it is a bit more baffling, markets are clearly pricing a high probability for recession (the negative ranking of materials and industrials clearly show this) but oil prices do not seem to reflect this! Pressure from proponents of peak oil and the continued strength of emerging market economies may go some way to explain this, but who knows? Sentiment can sometimes be finicky.